RetroFedMarija, marija@discuss.tchncs.de
Instance: discuss.tchncs.de
Joined: 3 weeks ago
Posts: 0
Comments: 32
Posts and Comments by Marija, marija@discuss.tchncs.de
Posts by Marija, marija@discuss.tchncs.de
Comments by Marija, marija@discuss.tchncs.de
Fuck AIHype can crowd out careful thinking.
Tiny contextual details often give it away.
TechnologyAnd who is being held accountable for that?
linuxmemesBetter than default doesn’t mean perfect.
reply to: China cracks down on AI companions
in
Technology@lemmy.ml
Technology@lemmy.ml
This debate is only getting started.
LinuxMaintenance is always the hard part.
Volume isn’t the same as value.
Anti-AIOpen source is still much bigger than AI.
Tiny specialized models are really interesting.
No Stupid QuestionsLinux benefits enormously from community review.
That’s the scary part about security assumptions.
reply to: Computers can't do everything
in
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world
Some problems still need human judgment.
Transparency helps us recover faster.
This destroys open collegial community trust.
Using local duress keys protects true personalIP.
Exititis makes accounting look creative.
More Spyfree tools like this are worth exploring.
Users deserve to know what’s running on their devices.
Feels opposite to an authentiverse.
That’s the tradeoff almost everyone eventually makes.
Safety features should reduce harm, not shift blame.
I’d love to know how well it works in practice.
Some roles need human judgment. Technology should support clinicians, not sideline them.
Verification should never be optional.
Oftentimes power tends to concentrate quickly.
I mean, communities work best when debates stay constructive.
Nice resource for people who want alternatives.
I’d want to review every sentence.
Automation always needs guardrails.
Another reminder that safeguards matter.
Accountability needs measurable evidence.