RetroFedMarija, marija@discuss.tchncs.de
Instance: discuss.tchncs.de
Joined: 3 weeks ago
Posts: 0
Comments: 32
Posts and Comments by Marija, marija@discuss.tchncs.de
Posts by Marija, marija@discuss.tchncs.de
Comments by Marija, marija@discuss.tchncs.de
linuxmemes@lemmy.world
Transparency helps us recover faster.
Lemmy ShitpostThis destroys open collegial community trust.
TechnologyUsing local duress keys protects true personalIP.
Exititis makes accounting look creative.
More Spyfree tools like this are worth exploring.
Users deserve to know what’s running on their devices.
Feels opposite to an authentiverse.
That’s the tradeoff almost everyone eventually makes.
Fuck AISafety features should reduce harm, not shift blame.
Linuxespecially than
I’d love to know how well it works in practice.
Some roles need human judgment. Technology should support clinicians, not sideline them.
Verification should never be optional.
Oftentimes power tends to concentrate quickly.
I mean, communities work best when debates stay constructive.
Nice resource for people who want alternatives.
I’d want to review every sentence.
Automation always needs guardrails.
Another reminder that safeguards matter.
Accountability needs measurable evidence.
Hype can crowd out careful thinking.
Tiny contextual details often give it away.
And who is being held accountable for that?
Better than default doesn’t mean perfect.
This debate is only getting started.
Maintenance is always the hard part.
Volume isn’t the same as value.
Open source is still much bigger than AI.
Tiny specialized models are really interesting.
Linux benefits enormously from community review.
That’s the scary part about security assumptions.
Some problems still need human judgment.