jaschop, jaschop@awful.systems

Instance: awful.systems
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 6
Comments: 123

RSS feed

Posts and Comments by jaschop, jaschop@awful.systems

You’re argument seems like Suresh’s to me, in that making working software is just laughably easy for a competent engineer.

This begs the question why noone is exploiting this market gap. But there’s a couple explanations…

It can be a coordination problem, in that there are just barely any competent software organisations with enough engineers. The problem can also lie in how software is bought, since customers seem completely unable to determine the competence of vendors. Perceptions on what kind of software is a safe, respectable choice may even be anti-helpful in this regard.


I don’t think you have to be hypercritical of that part. Sure, rose-colored glasses could play into it but he calls the bad stuff bad and doesn’t justify it via the good stuff.

Also the stuff he describes seems plausibly achievable through buddhist spiritial practice:

In many ways MAPLE delivered: life-long friendships, freedom from past addictions and limiting self-narratives, strengthened character, and, for many of us, profound spiritual openings and realizations.

This Soryu figure seems fairly well accredited in that department. He just also happens to be a megalomaniacal control freak.

(Also, why does he have to share a name with Asoka? I’m dying a little.)

edit: I knew I spelt megalomaniacal wrong…


Of course there’s a class element to this, but you give them too much credit.

This isn’t poor people being exposed to stupid AI so rich people can reap the benefits of actual AI. This is poor people being subjected to stupid AI so AI company shareholders can pretend that their stupid AI is worth anything for another quarter.


This apparently a reccurring April fools joke by @killedbygoogle on Twitter, that had me utterly punked.


thx. I’m thinking about making a PR to open-slopware once they’re back from vacation. The non-tainted section is scarce enough and could use more entries.


I once listened to a talk by a guy from german OSHA that hit a lot of the good points. Perceived productivity opposed to actual productivity from the METR studies. Mental load of alien code review. (This was a company-internal IT-expert exchange thingy.)

A question in Q&A (submitted anonymously on slido like a sniveling coward) was deadass “Have you ever coded with a frontier model?”


My bad, I only had half-information from some screenshot. Don’t really know or care what Google Keep is.


If you could get a ukranian drone unit to spray paint “TRANS RIGHTS” with the trans colors on a Flamingo FP-5 before they send it to blow up a refinery, that would make a good post.


They killed Google Keep btw. Not that I needed more reason not to tango with a corpo app again. All criticism here is based on failure to realize my utopian visions of spiritually pure notetaking.

The notes are just for me, but I was really hoping for a more conventional editor. No shade to emacs/vim enjoyers. (Heck, I use 90% NeoVim at work.)


The SSL stuff is finicky, but I got a template that is quite satisfying now.

I got a wildcard cert using acme.sh (works with both Let’s Encrypt and the API of my DNS registrar INWX), automated renewals scheduled with systemd. Internet facing proxy is Apache httpd, for every new service I just copy a conf template and update the URLs and ports. I can stand up a containerized service in 15min, provided it runs without issues.


It was on my shortlist before I settled on Flatnotes. Since I found out the AI stance of the dev there and encountered some technical issues… well I’m running a Silverbullet now.

It seemed a little too heavy on the customization front for me, but I guess I’ll figure it out.



This gives me strong Belter drinking bulb vibes.


Yeh, I’ve been complaining about noncritical german news for a while. DW is not much better on tech issues.

Although sometimes, a critical piece slips through. E.g. on the fact that chatbots are turning brains to mush in a measurable fashion and that a lot of businesses and professionals are telling whoever is asking that this shit just doesn’t work.

Still, the big-tech-press-piece-to-reputable-news-story pipeline is going strong.


Oh, I just got a lovely nah-uh in my inbox: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/21448556

But please let’s be discreet and not upset the critters further.


You can be an anarchist and poke fun at naive interpretations of anarchism. I don’t think you have to read “all anarchists are like these hypothetical human pets” into that joke.


equates it with anarcho primitivism

Hey, it specifies solarpunk. The fellas have at least solar panels in there. And they know how to use pharamaceuticals.

I’ll grant that gathering medication in the bushes is a little on the nose.


It’s paternalistic, all right, but that’s something different. I have a toddler, I should know.


Disagree, I think there’s something there.

Something about baby anarchists who get the spiritual lessons but stubbornly refuse to engage with the complexity of the world and try to naively derive practices straight from theory which end up laughably ineffective. In contrast, once it truly sinks in how fucked and complicated the world is and how powerless your faction is your political practice starts looking more “normal” ™️, but you harbor no ill will against the enthusiastic baby anarchists and sort of envy their lifestyle.

Might be wrong, can’t read OPs mind. But somehow it doesn’t feel mean-spirited.


RSS feed

Posts by jaschop, jaschop@awful.systems

Comments by jaschop, jaschop@awful.systems

Klingt ja ganz nett. Vielleicht purzeln dann auch mal ein paar Stellenausschreibungen raus, die nicht Fachkenntnisse in Enterprise Java, Oracle oder Azure fordern.


From what I got through, they mostly seem gleeful that schizophrenics fuck over Freud’s theories rather than concerned with the problems of actual schizophrenics. They kind of redefine the term to talk about their point on the fluidity of desire and self.


By “sexuality” is meant the sum of all desires that do not result from immediate economic pressures, such as things that don’t result in money or physical possessions of any sort.

Okay, was there maybe a better word to describe that phenomenon. Like, “desire”? Because my sexuality usually involves someone cumming.

But seriously, if you want to read psychoanalyst literature that fucks your brain, maybe try something more recent than Freud. Like Anti-Oedipus by Deleuze & Guattari.


Nah, they do android. Mf is still lazy imo.


Worlds tinyest fluffiest chef brings me an extra fry for being such a good patron at his all-avian-run restaurant.



I can’t tell if this is serious.

If that’s really how we react to someone who admits AI use although they know why AI is bad, we need to listen to Dr. Fatima some more.


TF2 Heavy voice

There is no such “underage woman”. Say is child. RATATATATATATATATATATATATAT

 reply
4

Tante nails it again. No notes.

That he has a LinkedIn finally explains how I first heard of him. A liberal but very startup/hustle culture brained colleague shared an anti-blockchain thing on the Slack. Always wondered how she stumbled on a comm(o|u)nist tech critic, but it must’ve been LI.


Yeah, but he’s been saying this for a while, and I don’t think this is a new way of saying it that is particularly useful.


Too narrow of a scope to be useful I think.

When he talks about LLCs, the real thing he’s referring to has to be capitalism. The “unaligned AI is already here, it’s corporations” trope has been around for a while, and I don’t think it convinced a lot of people to become socialists.

I think you can’t usefully tackle just the capitalism of the tech industry, if you don’t understand the wider system around it. I mean the VC that sloshes around in tech to raise up one bullshitteer after another comes from somewhere. Real estate, mining, fossil fuels, etc.


I just watched the whole thing. She makes a consistent case.

I felt a little called out by the being tolerant bit. I for sure haven’t had great success in talking to close people about their AI use. And I was maybe a little too cold to colleagues, who tried to get ahead of the AI literacy circus with good intentions, although I grudgingly agreed that they are right.

Maybe I don’t meet enough randos to get feeling on the level of pervasiveness of chatbots. Maybe it’s a personality thing; I worked myself out of depression mostly by disciplining myself and stopping to buy my own excuses, and that’s kind of how I approach every problem now. That sure isn’t a vibe that most people respond to.

There was one part of my AI beliefs that wasn’t adressed. Besides the “front-end” and “back-end” harms, that can be mitigated, the tech as a whole still seems trash to me. That may be boomerism setting in, but chatbots just feel counter to and displacing my positive vision for a social fabric, be it for responsible professional communities or for interpersonal connections.

(I do buy into the use-case for a context-sensitive search engine, e.g. for walls of legalese. But the current framing of the tools is just so harmful, even that use is hazardous as seen in the anecdote.)


Reminds me, some colleague was once trying to pull up a YouTube vid in Chrome on our megafancy 8k conference screen, but it wouldn’t play. He suspected it might be because YT locked down large screens because they didn’t like public viewing or whatever.

Pulled it up on my Firefox on Linux, ran fine.


Sounds kind of like the Baldur Bjarnason strategy but for your coworkers instead of your boss.

I can see the value of someone with a critical understanding diving into the technology, so they can talk others down from the ledge.

But you also need the social pressure to maintain some slop-free spaces. Not everyone can be asked to accomodate recovering slopaholics.




Against all the grease that Dr Oetker can conjure, all the heartburn that cheese stuffing can produce, we send onto it only you.



House of Saud (publication, not the royals) asks if the Iran war was caused by AI sycophancy.

I’m reminded of the Kremlin reality distortion field that appears to have informed the decision to invade Ukraine.


Dank KI konnten die USA in nur 3 Jahren ein Level an institutioneller Inkompetenz erreichen, für das die Soviet-Union/Russand Jahrzehnte gebraucht hatten.