RetroFedFiskFisk33, fiskfisk33@startrek.website
Instance: startrek.website
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 1
Comments: 144
Posts and Comments by FiskFisk33, fiskfisk33@startrek.website
sweden
Comments by FiskFisk33, fiskfisk33@startrek.website
TechnologyThey use QMK, which really is keyboard firmware with added on mouse functionality
Crappy Design90-100 isnt low
I’d say statistics knowledge is probably related to wether you’ve studied it or not, not so much your iq score
I dunno, the original Lotus esprit is still pretty cool in my book
Global NewsThats just a side effect. The primary purpose of the uranium in the warhead is its armor piercing capabilities.
Not The OnionThis is not oniony, this is just yet another “Elon musk says”
PC Master Racethey’re not wrong
Trippin' Through Time@lemmy.ca
medieval times
when I was a kid
…hmmm
absolutely not, but not all are owned by venture capital
production value increased, quality took a nose dive.
I disagree. Leaving someone with trauma, versus leaving someone in a life or death situation is quite different I’d say.
Lord Of The Rings Memes… oh no
Science Memes@mander.xyz
Its not turbulence, its more akin to a wake
Today I Learneddiesel? if only!
Greentextno?
Comic StripsIt’s technically infinite, but the set of numbers we can express (in a reasonable timeframe), while large, is finite.
if you get hit by a wall with infinite weight, moving at 1km/h, it has infinite energy, yet it will merely push you away
i do have to point out, the plane trip itself was far worse, climate wise, than the vibe writing.
That said, yes I agree, it is of course an extra load, that could be easily avoided.
You have it backwards. Larger vehicles of course have more energy, but pedestrians are too light for that to make a difference.
If you get hit by an oil tanker ship going ~1 kmh, that ship has orders of magnitude more kinetic energy than a car at highway speed, yet, unless theres a wall or something, the ship will merely push you harmlessly aside.
Its about the manner of delivery, not the vehicles energy.
Larger cars are more dangerous because they hit you higher up, where you have more vital organs.
They use QMK, which really is keyboard firmware with added on mouse functionality
90-100 isnt low
I’d say statistics knowledge is probably related to wether you’ve studied it or not, not so much your iq score
I dunno, the original Lotus esprit is still pretty cool in my book
Thats just a side effect. The primary purpose of the uranium in the warhead is its armor piercing capabilities.
This is not oniony, this is just yet another “Elon musk says”
they’re not wrong
…hmmm
absolutely not, but not all are owned by venture capital
production value increased, quality took a nose dive.
I disagree. Leaving someone with trauma, versus leaving someone in a life or death situation is quite different I’d say.
… oh no
Its not turbulence, its more akin to a wake
diesel? if only!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_fuel_oil
devs? yeah, no.
no?
It’s technically infinite, but the set of numbers we can express (in a reasonable timeframe), while large, is finite.
if you get hit by a wall with infinite weight, moving at 1km/h, it has infinite energy, yet it will merely push you away
i do have to point out, the plane trip itself was far worse, climate wise, than the vibe writing.
That said, yes I agree, it is of course an extra load, that could be easily avoided.
You have it backwards. Larger vehicles of course have more energy, but pedestrians are too light for that to make a difference.
If you get hit by an oil tanker ship going ~1 kmh, that ship has orders of magnitude more kinetic energy than a car at highway speed, yet, unless theres a wall or something, the ship will merely push you harmlessly aside.
Its about the manner of delivery, not the vehicles energy.
Larger cars are more dangerous because they hit you higher up, where you have more vital organs.