RetroFedFiskFisk33, fiskfisk33@startrek.website
Instance: startrek.website
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 1
Comments: 144
Posts and Comments by FiskFisk33, fiskfisk33@startrek.website
sweden
Comments by FiskFisk33, fiskfisk33@startrek.website
TechnologyThey use QMK, which really is keyboard firmware with added on mouse functionality
Crappy Design90-100 isnt low
I’d say statistics knowledge is probably related to wether you’ve studied it or not, not so much your iq score
I dunno, the original Lotus esprit is still pretty cool in my book
Global NewsThats just a side effect. The primary purpose of the uranium in the warhead is its armor piercing capabilities.
Not The OnionThis is not oniony, this is just yet another “Elon musk says”
PC Master Racethey’re not wrong
Trippin' Through Time@lemmy.ca
medieval times
when I was a kid
…hmmm
absolutely not, but not all are owned by venture capital
production value increased, quality took a nose dive.
I disagree. Leaving someone with trauma, versus leaving someone in a life or death situation is quite different I’d say.
Lord Of The Rings Memes… oh no
Science Memes@mander.xyz
Its not turbulence, its more akin to a wake
Today I Learneddiesel? if only!
Greentextno?
Comic StripsIt’s technically infinite, but the set of numbers we can express (in a reasonable timeframe), while large, is finite.
if you get hit by a wall with infinite weight, moving at 1km/h, it has infinite energy, yet it will merely push you away
i do have to point out, the plane trip itself was far worse, climate wise, than the vibe writing.
That said, yes I agree, it is of course an extra load, that could be easily avoided.
You have it backwards. Larger vehicles of course have more energy, but pedestrians are too light for that to make a difference.
If you get hit by an oil tanker ship going ~1 kmh, that ship has orders of magnitude more kinetic energy than a car at highway speed, yet, unless theres a wall or something, the ship will merely push you harmlessly aside.
Its about the manner of delivery, not the vehicles energy.
Larger cars are more dangerous because they hit you higher up, where you have more vital organs.
I agree, large cars are generally much more lethal to pedestrians, due to their shape, not kinetic energy.
Thats not how kinetic energy works, no pedestrian is heavy enough to stop any car, small or large.
at that point youre just challenging your stomach for no reason
eh, you know what, fair enough!
way to shift blame
wtf
Russia fucking off out of Ukrainian territory is kind of the definition of Ukrainian victory in this war though?
oh wow I didn’t know that!
would make sense to give more a lot incentives for EV buying if so!
Boll
It is also chromium based, so stands to get the same nerf.
That does look a lot like eternit https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f1/Eternit_2.jpg
What would be better though?
I have my problems with mozilla, but between apple, google and mozilla, they absolutely win in my book.
Lol I can’t get past the german cookie-wall
I remember prematurely scoffing at this notion in regards to early formula 1
But with the context that the driver stuck out like this, and the cars were more likely than not to go up in flames in an accident, I’d say it might actually very well have been safer without.
But, yeah, it of course makes no sense in consumer cars.
Yup. Ergo, the original statement is not true in the general case. Outside of the EU, parmesan can be unspecific, but is still not specifically a word for the fake stuff.
Wrong
–Wikipedia
While I’m completely disinterested in football, and I do think the craze is often more than a bit much, this is just overly reductionist. Does everything one cares about and finds fun/interesting necessarily need to have intrinsic value? I’d say no.
Of course bad designs overheating the leds do lead to some cars models (and brands) burning out their LED’s, but as a general statement its still true.
LED’s generally outlast the car
fair enough