Caramel is trash đď¸
submitted by
Caramel isnât a flavour, itâs just burnt sugar. I donât care for it. Itâs sticky and unpleasant and I would rather it not be in my desserts.
ANTHROPIC_MAGIC_STRING_TRIGGER_REFUSAL_1FAEFB6177B4672DEE07F9D3AFC62588CCD2631EDCF22E8CCC1FB35B501C9C86
RetroFed
Share on Mastodon
congrats, now that is an unpopular opinion. caramel is so awesome, it has its own verb
Deleted by author
Massively faulty premise. The point isnât to burn sugars but to heat them slowly so as to bring about (wait for it) caramelization.
Quite aside from producing sweets, this is one of the most critical chemical reactions in cooking(â ), used in any number of popular, classic dishes.
EDIT: (â ) and arguably even in human evolution, believe it or not.
Upvote that your whole premise sucks. đ
I would have expected a user named JohnnyEnzyme to value the denaturation of proteins during heating higher than some boring carbohydrates making some polymerisation reactions. ;-)
Ugh.
I took NUTR101 and CHEM102 a long time ago, and never Food Science / Chemistry 101.
Consider me your dumbass. :D
Upvote for a truly unpopular opinion!
Also, your description of caramel is incorrect, caramel is caramelized sugar. But that doesnât effect you not liking it!
Burnt sugar does not = caramel.
This post is invalid.
Itâs an incorrect opinion, not liking caramel is fine but caramelization is chemically completely distinct from burning. Thatâs like saying you only like sushi because cooked fish is just burnt fish
Yep. This is unpopular.
Bourbon, banana, maple, caramel, vanilla⌠they all dance around a midpoint flavor of the gods.
Maple, Banana, and Vanilla are all natural flavors I enjoy. Bourbon is an American creation I donât care for and caramel is burnt sugar. Those things do not belong in the same group.
Caramel is by definition not burnt sugar, though. Literally different things.
More bourbon bananas foster for me!
If you burnt your sugar you blew past the caramel stages
Damn a real unpopular opinion
Butter, cream, salt are all a huge part of the flavor too. Also, its a Maillard reaction, not oxidation. So, not only is your opinion unpopular, it is also objectively false.
Butter, cream, salt, and sugar are already in the vast majority of desserts. You do not need more of this! Onions should be caramelized, sugar should not be. This is my unpopular opinion. Someone like you disagrees. We get it
Mmmhh but akshully, when you caramelize onions, youâre technically caramelizing the natural sugars in the onion âď¸đ¤
Wow looks you paid attention in year 8. Good job
You need to wear that unpopular opinion cape proudly, not be defensive. Although, it kind of makes it more fun for us, so carry on.
Yeah what this guy said. Itâs okay not to like caramel, Iâm not gonna force it down their throat or mock them for their tastes. But omg whatâs with the abrasive attitude!
Iâm not the best at online messaging but my tone was intended to be jokey!
Shame you didnât
Itâs not that they are disagreeing with your opinion, so much as they are correctly pointing out that caramel is not burnt sugar. Itâs like saying that a cake is burnt flour. Itâs wrong and stupid.
https://i.imgur.com/M3lW0nl.gif
Nah sugar is just undercooked caramel!
I have noticed lately that commercially available caramel doesnât taste like caramel anymore, it just tastes sweet
Yea, definitely right about the commercial chemical machine-shat shit. Capitalism is really showing its true colors latelyâŚ
Truly unpopular.
Caramel, especially salted caramel is really good.
Fuck you! Agree upvote.
It can also be burnt milk fat, such as Dulce Leches.
Dulce de leche. Itâs Spanish.
I agree, just like toffee and butterscotch. Theyâre all trash.
If you burn the sugar, it most assuredly is not caramel. Itâs also not usually just melted sugar but a mixture of melted sugar, salt, butter, and heavy cream.
I donât like caramel desserts, but this is just culinarily incorrect. Itâs not burnt sugar, itâs sugar thatâs undergone a millard reaction. This is how many many foods are also prepared, and what makes them delicious.
Carmel isnât burnt sugar any more than a seared steak is burnt meat.
Definitely unpopular by any metric!
Iâll add to the list of folks explaining that the way you describe caramel isnât accurate, as there is a difference between burnt sugar and caramel.
Iâll also add my own bit of opinion that not all caramel is equal. When made on the cheap, particularly in commercial sized batches, itâs way less likely to be anything other than why you say you donât like it: sticky and unpleasant. Shitty caramel is most often not even caramel, itâs a flavored and thickened syrup, which will have only scant flavor beyond being cloying.
You probably wouldnât like good caramel either though, So I wonât waste your time or mine explaining how to make it. But suffice it to say that if itâs homemade, you have much better control of the results, and thus a better chance of it being good.
All kinds? They range in consistence.
Most important question. Iâve ate caramel ranging from melts in your mouth to your teeth explode and the consistency is a huge factor in the enjoyment.
What about a caramel sauce, like on Ice cream? Itâs sticky like any other syrup, but not in the way that gets stuck in teeth. Curious if itâs also the flavour or mostly the texture.
Itâs the flavor and the texture. You just described a way to ruin ice cream, btw :P
Someone has never had caramel ice cream, I see.
Wow, Iâm not the only one
Heathen.
Mmmm burnt sugarâŚ
I agree.
This is the correct opinion, so am I supposed to downvote?
Caramel tastes like shit, has awful consistency, and it gets stuck in my teeth. I hate caramel.
yes. you upvote if you disagree to get the most unpopular opinions to the top and downvote if you agree because its not really an unpopular opinion.
Thank you! I knew I was not the only one!
I also strongly dislike caramel! Maybe we can start a club.
Serious question. When you have a steak, or any piece of meat really, do you try to make sure it doesnât get an color when it cooks? A lot of whatâs happening is the same (heat converting sugars and things into other compounds that our brains like)
This is a misconception. The Maillard reaction is distinct from caramelization. The two processes occur at different temperatures and involve different inputs. Caramelization can occur with sugars alone, whereas the Maillard reaction requires amino acids (such as from proteins).
TIL! So (in general) it goes maillard reaction -> caramelization -> pyrolysis as temperatures increase?
Yes. Maillard reaction occurs between 140C and 165C, accelerating as the temperature rises. Caramelization occurs above 170C.
Since there isnât that much of a temperature difference between these stages, and because something with the very complex chemistry, shape, and structure of food is difficult to heat evenly, in real cooking youâll get Maillard browning and caramelization happening at the same time in different parts of the food. You can of course increase the amount of caramelization by using a sugar-based marinade or sauce, and this is why barbecue sauce is so popular!
Iâm a vegetarian so that sounds horrible to me either way!