At the core of the current world order’s domination is the English-American law. It defines what is legitimate and who is legitimate. It is very selfish, provincianistic and ruthless. It does not care about others in the world. It does not care that there are other people in the world, with different life experiences, circumstances, climate, anything. American law, at its essence, provides legitimacy to very few people in the world, and everyone else is a criminal or some sort of degraded entity. Every judge is really just a 12th century man of a small English farm town, hearing arguments of how this or that is more fitting to his 12th century farm town morals, evaluated within the contexts of those who lived their whole lives in that town. If you ever have the free time to go to court as a spectator, you’ll notice (if you’re not trained in American law) that what happens there is essentially people trying to justify themselves in white society. The arguments don’t have to make sense, and they usually don’t in a global setting.
RetroFed
socialism
politicaldiscussion
lemmyshitpost
Why not just steal from YouTube? nsfw
I’m not trying to get anyone in trouble here, but why hasn’t anyone tried to steal youtube’s content and make it available to non-paying users (read: users who refuse to partake in surveillance capitalism).
Law, legitimacy, and the world's resistance
At the core of the current world order’s domination is the English-American law. It defines what is legitimate and who is legitimate. It is very selfish, provincianistic and ruthless. It does not care about others in the world. It does not care that there are other people in the world, with different life experiences, circumstances, climate, anything. American law, at its essence, provides legitimacy to very few people in the world, and everyone else is a criminal or some sort of degraded entity. Every judge is really just a 12th century man of a small English farm town, hearing arguments of how this or that is more fitting to his 12th century farm town morals, evaluated within the contexts of those who lived their whole lives in that town. If you ever have the free time to go to court as a spectator, you’ll notice (if you’re not trained in American law) that what happens there is essentially people trying to justify themselves in white society. The arguments don’t have to make sense, and they usually don’t in a global setting.
What’s the right place? (there isn’t)
Law, legitimacy, and the world's resistance
At the core of the current world order’s domination is the English-American law. It defines what is legitimate and who is legitimate. It is very selfish, provincianistic and ruthless. It does not care about others in the world. It does not care that there are other people in the world, with different life experiences, circumstances, climate, anything. American law, at its essence, provides legitimacy to very few people in the world, and everyone else is a criminal or some sort of degraded entity. Every judge is really just a 12th century man of a small English farm town, hearing arguments of how this or that is more fitting to his 12th century farm town morals, evaluated within the contexts of those who lived their whole lives in that town. If you ever have the free time to go to court as a spectator, you’ll notice (if you’re not trained in American law) that what happens there is essentially people trying to justify themselves in white society. The arguments don’t have to make sense, and they usually don’t in a global setting.