RetroFed
flere-imsaho, mawhrin@awful.systems
Instance: awful.systems
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 0
Comments: 63
Posts and Comments by flere-imsaho, mawhrin@awful.systems
Posts by flere-imsaho, mawhrin@awful.systems
Comments by flere-imsaho, mawhrin@awful.systems
NotAwfulTech
TechTakesoh, same.
there’s a new variant of the old crypto affinity grift around, too: banning crypto projects is transphobia.
there are two things that are obvious in his blog: first, michał is an incredibly privileged dude (who doesn’t notice his privilege because, coming from poland, he sees himself as underprivileged), and second, the moment people finally leave the vicinity of the formalized skeptic movement is strictly dependent on how much misogyny and racism they tolerate.
2017, three years post gamergate, is quite much.
westerners and their clever takes about eastern europe, eh.
that’s ableism, and as always with ableism, entirely unwarranted.
how does union busting help?
it focuses entirely on britain, so that’s understandable
and now realise that this motherfucker is a practising psychiatrist
my lishp is my cashtle
a precise ukrainian drone might be a safer option
a person whose last two years worth of github contributions are related to confabulation machinery, surely this is an unbiased analysis.
so there’s this thing with borg…
my commisserations. i severed contacts with a number of people who went the anti-vaccine way and it’s fucking sad.
just in case: i immensely appreciate the random pearls of highly-specific knowledge that sometimes land here as random comments. thank you so much.
yes, but (i’ve corrected my bloody typo above), there are independent confirmations of veracity. so i think it’s fine to complain here, but it would detract from the point outside the sneering area.
it doesn’t mean he’s not inaccurate in that particular piece.
gebru straight up judges the text on the composition of the guests at the unveiling, and declines to read it, this is kremlinology in the worst style.
it is a doctrinal document directed at the catholic faithful, it is useful to actually take it at face value, and criticise it for its own (de)merits.
for the nerds here, said head of the catholic fucking church quotes (correctly!) one gandalf from the works of well known catholic writer named tolkien
there’s also nb, which at least doesn’t contain claude commits.
oh, same.
there’s a new variant of the old crypto affinity grift around, too: banning crypto projects is transphobia.
there are two things that are obvious in his blog: first, michał is an incredibly privileged dude (who doesn’t notice his privilege because, coming from poland, he sees himself as underprivileged), and second, the moment people finally leave the vicinity of the formalized skeptic movement is strictly dependent on how much misogyny and racism they tolerate.
2017, three years post gamergate, is quite much.
westerners and their clever takes about eastern europe, eh.
that’s ableism, and as always with ableism, entirely unwarranted.
how does union busting help?
heresiarch says what?
it focuses entirely on britain, so that’s understandable
and now realise that this motherfucker is a practising psychiatrist
my lishp is my cashtle
a precise ukrainian drone might be a safer option
a person whose last two years worth of github contributions are related to confabulation machinery, surely this is an unbiased analysis.
so there’s this thing with borg…
my commisserations. i severed contacts with a number of people who went the anti-vaccine way and it’s fucking sad.
just in case: i immensely appreciate the random pearls of highly-specific knowledge that sometimes land here as random comments. thank you so much.
yes, but (i’ve corrected my bloody typo above), there are independent confirmations of veracity. so i think it’s fine to complain here, but it would detract from the point outside the sneering area.
it doesn’t mean he’s not inaccurate in that particular piece.
gebru straight up judges the text on the composition of the guests at the unveiling, and declines to read it, this is kremlinology in the worst style.
it is a doctrinal document directed at the catholic faithful, it is useful to actually take it at face value, and criticise it for its own (de)merits.
for the nerds here, said head of the catholic fucking church quotes (correctly!) one gandalf from the works of well known catholic writer named tolkien