jackz, jackz@beehaw.org

Instance: beehaw.org
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 0
Comments: 2

Posts and Comments by jackz, jackz@beehaw.org

reply to: Is EXT4 more efficient then FAT? in Linux Furs@pawb.social

Oh you’re right yeah. I also saw an article also about exfat being opened source by Microsoft in 2019

 reply
3
reply to: Is EXT4 more efficient then FAT? in Linux Furs@pawb.social

Its less about efficiency and just about compatibility at least in terms of fat and ext4. Ext4 is open and was designed for Linux, where fat was for windows and was closed off and hard for Linux to support

I’m not sure about the file size diffs, maybe different default compression levels or a incomplete copy?

 reply
0

Posts by jackz, jackz@beehaw.org

Comments by jackz, jackz@beehaw.org

reply to: Is EXT4 more efficient then FAT? in Linux Furs@pawb.social

Oh you’re right yeah. I also saw an article also about exfat being opened source by Microsoft in 2019

 reply
3
reply to: Is EXT4 more efficient then FAT? in Linux Furs@pawb.social

Its less about efficiency and just about compatibility at least in terms of fat and ext4. Ext4 is open and was designed for Linux, where fat was for windows and was closed off and hard for Linux to support

I’m not sure about the file size diffs, maybe different default compression levels or a incomplete copy?

 reply
0