RetroFedEarthwormjim91, earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
Instance: lemmy.world
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 7
Comments: 114
Posts and Comments by Earthwormjim91, earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
motorcycles
sooners
bourbon
Comments by Earthwormjim91, earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
Greentext@sh.itjust.works
No, that’s not how it works.
If you have 1.5oz of vodka mixed with 3oz of water 94 6oz of water, it makes no difference. You’re still drinking 1.5oz of vodka.
Greentext@sh.itjust.works
I wouldn’t say most cocktails are shaken.
Most spirit heavy cocktails are stirred.
Anything in the Negroni family will be stirred. Anything in the old fashioned family, martini family, etc. Basically any cocktail that is predominantly just spirits.
You shake when you have mixers like citrus, egg, or dairy.
Lefty MemesBy not voting you explicitly stated you’re fine with exactly what we have now.
Voting is a zero sum game. Someone is going to win whether you stay home or not, and that someone is going to massively affect your life and the lives of others.
And Harris would have been infinitely better than Trump for Palestinians.
So congratulations, you decided that your protest no-vote was more important than Palestinian lives. Because by not voting you said you’re fine with Trump openly supporting their genocide. Their blood is on your hands just as much as Trump supporters.
I am so sick of you idiots letting perfect be the enemy of good, and sleepwalking us all into fascism because you think you’re so special and they need to earn your vote specifically. It’s childish and selfish.
Political Memes@lemmy.world
Four decades.
He was one of the most frequently cited scientists across all scientific journals from 1983-2002 and has served as an advisor to every president since Reagan.
Political Memes@lemmy.world
Have you even read that? The US is still the top donor, contributing more than all of Europe combined. And that’s with the massive decrease in spending by the Trump admin.
The US went from about half of all global humanitarian spending (since that is not just food aid, which I was talking about but hey, move those goalposts!) to 23%.
Political Memes@lemmy.world
It basically is already. There are so many food security programs in the US.
There’s SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) which gives cash directly to low-income people to buy food. It’s basically food stamps.
There’s WIC which provides free essential foods for low-income women and their children.
There’s TEFAP (The Emergency Food Assistance Program), which provides free food boxes and prepared meals to low-income households and supplies food banks.
There’s CSFP (Commodity Supplemental Food Program) which provides monthly free food boxes to low-income seniors 60+ through food banks.
There’s CACFP (Child and Adult Care Food Program) which provides reimbursements for meals and snacks to eligible children and adults who are enrolled for care at participating childcare centers, day care homes, and adult day care centers.
There’s NSLP (National School Lunch Program) which funds free and reduced-price lunches for low-income students.
There’s SBP (School Breakfast Program) which funds school breakfasts for free or reduced-price for low-income students and subsidizes the cost for all students to keep prices lower.
There’s SFSP (Summer Food Service Program) which provides funding for sites to feed children and teens on school breaks that can’t get food at school. For free, and open to anyone 18 and younger, or older than 18 with disabilities. Here’s a map of all sites in the US that participate. https://kidsfoodfinder.org/
Between all of these programs, you have to try to starve in the US. Starvation and malnutrition in the US is largely isolated to the elderly with severe cognitive disabilities like Alzheimer’s and dementia, and those with severe eating disorders. Malnutrition from lack of food is almost non-existent in the US because, despite Republicans’ best efforts, we actually do have a robust safety net when it comes to food.
And this is on top of also providing more than half of global food aid.
Ask LemmyBandcamp is great for extremely underground artists, but that’s about all that is on there.
Political Memes@lemmy.world
Because the UN has exactly one purpose: Serve as a forum for nations to communicate and prevent world war.
That’s it.
You can read the US’ reasoning for it here: https://geneva.usmission.gov/2017/03/24/u-s-explanation-of-vote-on-the-right-to-food/
The US also voted no because the belief that States are responsible for implementing human rights provisions themselves, not requiring other countries to pick up the tab. The US already provides more than half of global food aid. This resolution would have amounted to “all of your food belongs to everyone” which is bullshit.
VideosThere have been multiple cases. And if you’re talking about the one with the little dog, they literally trespassed onto someone’s property, took the dog from their porch, then killed it before the owner could even find where the dog was taken.
Nope. This has been proven false by pretty much every study on the subject for 50 years.
Good thing is that this doesn’t really get to be an opinion. Well, I guess anything can be an opinion, but this one is objectively wrong if you differentiate them.
There have been several studies done on this, and brain scans show that physically reading with your eyes and listening to an audiobook trigger the exact same responses in the brain. They have the exact same effect, and your brain comprehends them the exact same.
Studies back in the 80s showed a direct correlation in listening comprehension and reading comprehension. They’re directly linked. In the 70s, studies showed that college students that listened to a short story could summarize it with equal accuracy to those that read it.
The science is pretty clear, physically reading a story and listening to it are the exact same and require the same amount of effort and attention to walk away with a good comprehension of the material.
It’s not about believing in the system.
It’s the only system we can have that the people will have any power. It’s either democracy, or being ruled over. And we will always trend towards the latter if the people abdicate the power they have.
There will NEVER be a time where we can just sit back and say “cool, things are good now, we don’t need to participate in politics anymore”. It will ALWAYS be either fighting to enforce our own power, or fighting to get that power back through revolution.
The power may lie with capital right now, but that’s because >1/3 of people (at least in the US) simply sit at home on their fat asses and don’t even try to participate in the system. And that’s for the biggest elections too. Where things really matter, at the state and local level, primaries where you get a say in who is even on the ballot, turnout is even worse.
Where I am, we have mail in voting, and a ballot is automatically sent to you, along with a booklet with everything on the ballot. The full text of what you’re voting on, a plain English explanation of what it will do, any tax changes that would happen from it, and arguments for and against. For primaries, if you’re not registered with a party you get both ballots and get to choose which one to vote in. It literally could not be any easier to vote. Our primaries this year? Thirty-fucking-six percent. 36%. And that was a “surge” in participation.
You can vote in your underwear at home, for weeks before the election date. And 64% of people still said fuck it, they don’t care enough. *That’s *entirely why the wealthy are able to control things. The people do not give a shit enough about it to even do their basic civic responsibility and exercise their vote, from their goddamn couches.
Well, voting for one. The US has abysmal voter turnout. More people stayed home and said they don’t give a shit in 2024 than either candidate got in votes.
The highest turnout we’ve had in over 100 years is 66%. A full 1 in 3 people that can vote put literally zero effort into voting.
That would be a decent start. Just actually doing anything to participate in the system.
And how much do you think the artist gets from the CD sale? Listen to it more than a handful of times, and it’s a lower payout than streaming.
Apple Music has the second highest payouts to artists, only behind Tidal which is much more expensive.
You really can’t have it both ways. You either want artists to get paid, in which case you’re paying more, or you want it for cheap and artists get paid less.
It’s literally the only possible system that could work. The alternative is just giving unrestricted power to politicians, and the people have no say at all.
Their power is ultimately derived from the voting public. That’s it. That is the power. You either have the ultimate power rest with the people, or the people have zero power.
It’s a cop out excuse to not put in the effort to be active and informed in the system. “It’s pointless anyway” is just defeatist bullshit.
Then the people need to put even more effort into exercising their power. It’s that simple.
Humans DO enjoy being busy. But not doing bullshit for companies.
Comic Strips@lemmy.world
This is just the classic “four boxes of liberty”, rephrased.
By voting. The US has set term lengths at every level. If the leaders are not fulfilling their job properly, they get fired.
For representatives it’s every two years.
That requires having an informed and active constituency though, which we do not have.
Yeah the article doesn’t actually say that at all. That appears to be pulled straight out of OP’s ass.
However, if that’s the installed cost, and per kW, then that’s insanely cheap. Solar where I am is about $2500 per kW capacity installed. $25 per kW would be dirt cheap.
It’s not capitalism per se. It’s the lazy, stupid populace that allows the system of regulatory capture we have.
The fossil fuel industry also gets a metric fuck ton of tax payer funded subsidies. That’s not capitalism. That’s a quasi state economy.
In a true capitalist system, we’d see more competitive forms of energy taking off, like solar and wind which are cheaper than fossil fuels at this point. But because the government keeps fossil fuels going, we’re not getting off them.
The defense budget is entirely irrelevant to healthcare. We already spend multiple times the defense budget on Medicare and Medicaid, and another several times as much on health insurance premiums, copays, and coinsurance.
We could have universal healthcare without touching the defense budget at all, and it would still be cheaper than the system we currently have.
No it’s hard. There’s absolutely no question about it. And I love lifting and working out. It’s hard.
But that’s also a product of a sedentary generation where physical labor is not the primary means of making a living.
I grew up in a blue collar family and did it myself until I joined the military. Physical labor is hard.
My dad, my grandpa, and most of the rest of my family didn’t have a choice. Making money and raising a family is hard. They all did it with hard manual labor. Plumbing and being mechanics and doing paint and body work. They didn’t need to exercise because they were lifting weights all day as a job.
Most of us don’t do that today. We drive to work, sit around at a computer, drive home, and then sit around being exhausted mentally. I get it. It’s hard to say “go lift weights for fun” or “ok now go run 5 miles.” It’s a lot easier to be exhausted and healthy when your day job is physically intensive because you knock out that basic requirement. You go home tired but physically fulfilled.
I’m in an office now and I hate it. I miss being physically exhausted just from work. I miss when going to the gym was extra trying to grow more and not just a necessity to not rot into my chair.
It’s hard to go to the gym now when I’m mentally exhausted doing shit I hate. I hate that the office drains my energy doing bullshit.
It’s hard. That’s not a knock on people today. But it is still necessary. And there’s no easy button like for everything else. You can ozempic your way out of being fat, but you can’t ozempic your way out of depression. Antidepressants are far from an easy button and often cause more problems. Being skinny doesn’t fix it the same way as working for it does.
Ugh. Yeah that’s a bitch. Cheaper than a legal fight but that’s not helpful if it crunches the budget.
But if you can swing it, it will only be a long term benefit. Especially with kids.
Yeah. I’d hate for some dumb legal shit to happen over nothing. Best to just get it done and a clean slate with no legal issues at all, even if it is a pain in the ass.
It’s also a lot of legal rights and privileges. And in many places it’s also a default inheritance. If something were to happen to her, you would have no rights to make any decisions. Her husband would. Her assets would become his.
Even if you aren’t interested in being married, it’s in her best interest to actually finalize the divorce to avoid a litany of issues.
I’ve met my federal representative in person a dozen or so times at her office locally, and been to 6 town halls, both in person and virtual teleconference town halls. My state House rep I have met a ton. He’s extremely active in the community.
Your first point is the big one.
Everybody wants an easy button for everything. Exercise is hard, requires consistent effort over time, and the results are subtle and take a while to see.
Lol yeah that’s the issue. You cannot expect people to put rules on themselves like that if nobody is going to enforce it. It truly does fall to the constituency to be the enforcement by voting them out when they abdicate their responsibilities.
No, he didn’t. The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 was passed and signed into law by Bush a month before the 2008 election even happened. The only thing you can really say is that Senator Obama was one of 70 yes votes on the bill in the Senate.
Obama signed the American Rescue and Recovery Act of 2009, which was heavily focused on stimulus and assistance to individuals and working families. He also signed Dodd-Frank which put a ton of new restrictions on the banks.
Basic facts matter.
It should be, yes. The good ones are already doing this, but there absolutely should be some requirement to make the lazy ones actually do their job.
And, ideally, we’d have an active and informed constituency that keeps their representatives honest. They should be terrified of being voted out because their constituents keep their feet to the fire.
Oklahoma has had Service by Publication for over 20 years.
Most places have Service by Publication, including Oklahoma.
She would need to file the petition, and then run a legal notice in a paper that serves that county, and that would count. Doesn’t matter if he ever actually sees or responds to it. She will have fulfilled her legal obligation for service.
You’re wrong, but for a different reason.
Being on recess isn’t the issue. They should be on recess and working in their districts more often than they are actually in session in DC. They ideally shouldn’t be in session that much at all. Their primary role is being at home in their district working with their constituents and that’s where the vast majority of work is intended to take place.
Not working while on recess is a completely different issue, and that’s up the constituents to enforce via voting. Plenty of representatives and senators are actively working in their districts when on recess, like they should be. Those that aren’t should be voted out by their constituents. If the constituents keep voting them in, they’re openly saying that’s the representation they want. And that’s on them.
You have a fundamental misunderstanding of how Congress works.
Time spent in DC is supposed to be the smallest part of their job. Recess isn’t vacation for them, if they’re doing it right. Recess is when they actually do the job of representation. They’re supposed to be spending time in their districts holding town halls, having open office hours, and working with local groups on issues that need to be brought up when they are in session.
They should be spending more time with their constituents than in DC. Spending time with constituents is the most fundamental job function of a representative.
A lot don’t do that though, and that’s on their idiot constituents for continually voting them in and not holding them accountable.
No. They are required by law to buy their own health insurance from the ACA marketplace.
There’s a difference between “has connected features” and “REQUIRES connected features” though. Again, you’re making a false equivalency.
Yes, pretty much every new vehicle has some sort of connectivity, and almost all have some sort of paid subscription to use those connected features in the app.
That’s entirely different than requiring you to have a subscription and use the app. Most new cars do NOT do that. They still have all the basic functionality without using the connected features, and the features are literally extra features so you can do things outside of the range of the fob, or add some extra things that the fob can’t do.
Buy any of the other vehicles out there that don’t pull that bullshit?
Lol it wasn’t a choice between that car and walking. That’s a massive false equivalency.
Yup. Blame Google for that one. They built a trillion dollar empire on collecting data better than anyone else, and using that data to sell extremely targeted ads.