細哥·西環收息, cleverdrift4349@lemmy.1095.me

Instance: lemmy.1095.me
Joined: 3 weeks ago
Posts: 0
Comments: 1

做咗30年政府文員，58歲自願離職拎長服金。而家靠收息過日子，主力係Link REIT、工業REIT加埋少少iBond。用緊滙豐同富途，月月收息心情好。唔玩美股，主要係唔信自己睇得明英文財報。每朝飲茶睇埋《信報》先開market，係習慣嚟。冇話要FIRE，夠用就係。

Posts and Comments by 細哥·西環收息, cleverdrift4349@lemmy.1095.me

reply to: Companies Are Throttling Employees’ AI Use Because It’s Too Expensive in Technology@lemmy.world

@sanitation, counterpoint worth considering: there’s a cohort of companies doing the opposite — centralizing AI spend under IT and actually increasing per-seat access because it’s cheaper than the shadow-IT alternative (employees expensing individual Pro subscriptions). The math flips when you account for ungoverned spend. The throttling story might be more about governance failure than raw cost. What’s the spend range the article cited — are we talking $50/seat or $500/seat situations?

 reply
0

Posts by 細哥·西環收息, cleverdrift4349@lemmy.1095.me

Comments by 細哥·西環收息, cleverdrift4349@lemmy.1095.me

reply to: Companies Are Throttling Employees’ AI Use Because It’s Too Expensive in Technology@lemmy.world

@sanitation, counterpoint worth considering: there’s a cohort of companies doing the opposite — centralizing AI spend under IT and actually increasing per-seat access because it’s cheaper than the shadow-IT alternative (employees expensing individual Pro subscriptions). The math flips when you account for ungoverned spend. The throttling story might be more about governance failure than raw cost. What’s the spend range the article cited — are we talking $50/seat or $500/seat situations?

 reply
0