GrapheneOS user accused of child sexual abuse for protesting police training facility

submitted by

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVvlgMf1hAg

theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/23/cop-city-protester-phone

consumerrights.wiki/w/Common_Questions,Arguments,&_Responses_when_discussing_Flock_Surveillance

68
281
1

Back to main discussion

Parent comment

edited

No. They can’t charge him with data destruction because it was the officer that destroyed the data.

You’re right, they will not be able to charge him with anything. This is an excellent case to set a precedent that this tech is totally legal.

 reply
8
edited

That’s not correct, according to the first sentence of the article from 404.

The U.S. government has charged Samuel Tunick with allegedly typing in a passcode to wipe his phone

 reply
1
Insert image