RetroFed
[Opinion] Europe's Patience With China's Factory Glut Runs Out
https://theeuropeanpost.eu/external-relations/europes-patience-with-chinas-factory-glut-runs-out/
For three years Europe has repeated the same phrase about China, de-risking, not decoupling, and for three years it has struggled to show what the phrase means in practice. In mid-2026 that is starting to change.
At the European Council on 19 June, heads of state handed the Commission a clear political mandate to strengthen the bloc’s defences against Chinese industrial overcapacity and other forms of what Brussels calls unfair competition. The debate ran for more than two hours, which in European summitry signals a genuine argument rather than a rubber stamp.
The numbers behind the frustration are stark. The EU’s trade deficit with China has swollen to roughly 360 billion euros a year, close to a billion euros every day. Behind that figure sits a pattern European manufacturers know well: heavily subsidised Chinese capacity in electric vehicles, solar panels, batteries and now chemicals, produced far in excess of Chinese demand and pushed onto world markets at prices domestic rivals cannot match.
…
Yet the [European] Commission is careful to keep the door open. De-risking was always meant to reduce exposure, not to sever a relationship worth hundreds of billions in two-way trade.
…
Beijing, for its part, reads every tariff as provocation and has warned of retaliation against European farm goods, spirits and luxury exports.
…
What has shifted in 2026 is not the slogan but the resolve behind it. Europe has stopped debating whether Chinese overcapacity is a problem and started arguing about how forcefully to answer it. For a bloc that prizes consensus and caution, that is a meaningful change of gear.
…
Share on Mastodon
Share on Reddit
Share on WhatsApp
Apparently not ample enough to post it lol
Demanding articles that can easily be found across the web in high numbers doesn’t add to the debate culture here.
These are some I found found for you in less than a minute:
June 2023: Systemic failures in product compliance on TEMU and Shein
August 2024: Shein and Temu products found to contain high levels of toxic chemicals
June 2025: EU commissioner shocked by dangers of some goods sold by Shein and Temu
Here is a report for several unsafe and poisonous products sold on Temu, Shein, AliExpress: https://www.beuc.eu/sites/default/files/publications/BEUC-X-2025-007_Tests_of_Temu_Products_by_Consumer_Groups.pdf
Feel free to search more for yourself.
Making baseless claims without providing any sources adds nothing to the debate. If they’re so easy to find - all the more reason to spend 10 seconds linking them. How is anyone supposed to know which ones you’re referring to?
The ‘sources’ you just linked are completely unrelated to the original article. The article is about Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 of the European Parliament. Even though it doesn’t name it directly, you can find nearly identical articles that do. It’s just a terrible article overall.
Regulation 2023/1230 covers CNC machine tools and software for them. Temu, Shein, and AliExpress have absolutely nothing to do with that, because none of them produces or sells CNC machinery or software.
As you can read from the regulation itself, and from various coverages of it, all companies’ products and services are required to meet the exact same standards. Whether you produce in the EU or import from China (or wherever else) - same rules apply.
https://www.ynypm.com/news/policy-regulation/rade-regulations/EU-s-Revised-Machinery-Regulation–Key-Impacts-and-Industry-Response.html
Just because Temu, Shein, or AliExpress sometimes fail to meet EU standards doesn’t mean all Chinese companies always fail to do so. This is terrible logic. If you can’t provide proof that violations are happening - don’t claim so. Or highlight that it’s just your suspicion. Otherwise you’re spreading misinformation.
It should also be noted that CNC machinery is held to considerably higher standards, since those machines are used by huge factories employing many workers. Using non-compliant devices would also break workers protection laws, since they’d be working in unsafe conditions.
Additional sources:
According to you: Just because 3 of the biggest China exporters sometimes fail to meet EU standards isn’t proof that violations are happening.
Wtf is that logic?
According to your logic: Ford cars break EU regulations by default, because so do Facebook’s services.
Truly perfect logic with no errors whatsoever.