zbyte64, zbyte64@awful.systems
Instance: awful.systems
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 0
Comments: 511
Posts and Comments by zbyte64, zbyte64@awful.systems
Posts by zbyte64, zbyte64@awful.systems
Comments by zbyte64, zbyte64@awful.systems
Like the mangrove forests in Africa and Asia. Scarcity is a feature, not a bug.
Other ledgers have him under worthless
Now what would a group of horny middle schoolers do to a bot like that?
Ehh, that’s not why it’s our fault. Acting like voting in giving consent is why it is our fault.
I’ll do all that when the spec is written in stone.
This is some woke DEI propaganda to change the definition of a princess. If a dragon is a princess then it defies the very concept of a woman. /s
Sure you can make the technology more resilient but if the enforcement is punitive enough then it won’t matter.
I think https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molly_Ringwald but nothing in the bio makes the reference make sense
“do whatever if can to achieve it"*
- which includes misinterpreting the intent of the goal in order to achieve a goal
Unrecognizable without a smaller face.
To not do it would be silencing ideas which would make you just like his killer.
Well, there is their family members who either ignore them or make fun of them behind their backs.
The purpose of a system is what it does. Gotta get those recruitment numbers up!
I guess a national labor strike is violent to some people’s profits.
Costs more than a couple cameras….
If you’re going to start counting shipping costs for the goods then you should compare thet to Amazon
If they were actually firing bad employees then they would start with the executives. The whole AI thing is largely a reflection of what executives think work is, where you just need to prompt your employees better to get better results
You need actual examples of a company working for the betterment of society to train the AI though.
You can point out how this makes the world a better place but don’t celebrate that fact because it is against the rules here.
RetroFed
Put the AI critique aside for a moment. Many people on lemmy dont like algorithms managing their feed. There’s probably a big overlap between people who are pervasively sensitive to dark algorithms and people who perceive AI as a dark algorithm parlor trick .
Lossy compression with no internal mechanism for detecting information corruption.
Affordable cost of living is a communist plot to destroy America
Because Iran isn’t going to challenge them in the US courts but the ICJ/ICC (if at all)
The bigots are going to vote for the biggest bigot regardless.
My city is talking about privatizing the libraries….
And the execs that made thr decision to fire in the first place will be punished by giving them bonuses.
It’s wild how we cater to the feelings of such voters while telling leftists they need to vote blue no matter who to save democracy. Where is that messaging for the xenophobes?
Was talking about social media, but my fault for not being more clear.
For the uninitiated: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jun/22/albania-protests-jared-kushner-ivanka-trump-resort-sazan-island-anger-government
You can place bets on the death of democracy on polymarket but can’t place bets on the death of CEOs. Kind of makes you think 🤔
The purpose of a system is what it does.
To be fair, having a cross as your religious symbol tends to attract a death cult
“yeah there’s a new giant structure and there’s a new persistent and pervasive sound in the region that both appeared around the same time, but there’s no data connecting the two. It could just be the sound of my own ego”
Hell, that sounds like actual leadership
IDK, cobol programmers still do well these days
Right on time for the markets to close
The description that the LLM did it on its own is subjective at best. I’ll just leave it at that. Have a good one
Without securing a popular mandate through an election? People are tired of elites rewriting the rules, how exactly is a vanguard going to be viewed as legitimate?
It’s not “bested” by the LLM though, a mathematician used the LLM as a tool to disprove a conjecture. Subtract the mathematicians from the process and the LLM would not have successfully completed the task. It would be more accurate to say a mathematician with an LLM was able to best a mathematician who did not have an LLM. Which is cool, but we don’t need to pretend the LLM is not a tool but something that “understands” math like a mathematician