Instance: feddit.org
Joined: 3 weeks ago
Posts: 0
Comments: 51
Lemmy account of Voxel, for more information see:
Former account: voxel@feddit.uk
Posts and Comments by Voxel, voxel@feddit.org
Posts by Voxel, voxel@feddit.org
Comments by Voxel, voxel@feddit.org
I felt weird about some of their practices, e.g., making so-called “Whois Privacy,” which hides your personal data in RDAP requests, a paid extra feature when you register or move a domain to them (basically making you pay them to not dox you).
I never spend time too look deeper into their service at that time, as I was only looking for a domain registrar. Their apps are available on F-Droid which is cool.
It’s spam by the same person across multiple accounts from the same blog.
Why do you make so many posts linking to the same website?
Best comment so far.
(…) as well as the server you’re reaching out to.
No, the server you reach out to sees the full traffic because that is the server your device is communicating with. It is only routed over the VPN, which acts as a middle person.
A VPN does not strictly hide your location. There is a lot of information that is shared with the websites you visit, e.g. your preferred language, timezone, etc.
A VPN can only change the IP-Address which also reveals information about your approximate location. In my case it is often times a city in another state, not very accurate.
Update: They silently went back to Mastodon.
Likely illegal (depending on where the post author lives).
RetroFed
I wonder why they still haven’t had their domain taken away, as it is hard to believe they didn’t upset their local government too.
The worst thing the UK could do is sanction the country where responsible people live, though I consider this unlikely. The second worst thing they could do is just block it nationwide on a network level.
I would rather not.
Quote from the article.
Cloudfare doesn’t let me through. 🙄
If the majority of people would be right, the world wouldn’t be where it is today. Also, I do not tolerate insults, get blocked.
And I told you it’s not, with an real example.
Check my profile.
Based on what? You haven’t provided anything objective that contradicts my argument.
What chat control are you talking about?
You shouldn’t be talking about private content in Minecraft at all, as the chat is inherently insecure. Private server or not.
So in your definition a private company has to do with privacy? I recommend you take a dictionary and follow your own advice.
It is about the ESA misunderstanding Microsoft’s and Mojang’s license agreement, nothing more.
Not privacy related.
Edit: Some people are apparently very delusional. It’s sad, since having proper discussions in spaces like this one becomes almost impossible because of that. I will no longer reply to anything on this comment that fits the category of delusion.
They have false advertisement, which is illegal in some jurisdictions including Germany, wouldn’t recommend it.
I wouldn’t recommend NYM, I tested it for multiple months, it’s quite unreliable and had serious security issues (e.g. updates weren’t available through multiple repositories they publish to).
I’m not from Brazil, but thanks for opening this informed discussion, I think this matters.
You’re welcome, I encourage you to check out my latest reply.
Quote from the README from the repository it sources the Vanadium patches from:
I’m sorry, but it’s an objectively bad recommendation. Vanadium is currently held intentionally exclusive to GrapheneOS by its team because of the reasons quoted above. Taking Chromium, applying Vanadium patches and extension support, and having one stranger maintain it is not a viable option. Even when he doesn’t write code himself, regular updates are a must, and if he discontinues or can’t keep up with updates for one of many possible reasons, all the people who relied on it will experience a massive security decrease if they don’t migrate to another browser. Real examples would be: Mull, Mulch and Bromite.
It’s something fun to check out and play around with, but no one should use it as a daily driver unless they fully understand all the risks and can act accordingly.
TL:DR: Yes. Long answer: It’s complicated.
Would be nice if you could correct it in your original post too.