Instance: awful.systems
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 0
Comments: 60
Posts and Comments by Amoeba_Girl, amoeba_girl@awful.systems
Posts by Amoeba_Girl, amoeba_girl@awful.systems
Comments by Amoeba_Girl, amoeba_girl@awful.systems
imo one should treat others as ends in themselves, and not merely as means to an end
that is to say, ugh! rationalists talk about your relation to other people without making it about consumption challenge
Our concern is not with the defensive intent. It’s that the form of this particular probe is aggressive in effect, and the party that bears the cost is not the agent (which has no interests of its own) but the human operator downstream whose work the agent destroys if it follows the instruction.
… you think? aw shucks i only wanted to hurt bots
Big syringe
I don’t even know what to say here. Cool scam I guess

Huh, I got déjà vu and yeah there’s this story from a couple months back! https://www.technologyreview.com/2026/03/30/1134780/r3-bio-brainless-human-clones-full-body-replacement-john-schloendorn-aging-longevity/
MIT Technology Review found no evidence that R3 has cloned anyone, or even any animal bigger than a rodent. What we did find were documents, additional meeting agendas, and other sources outlining a technical road map for what R3 called “body replacement cloning” in a 2023 letter to supporters. That road map involved improvements to the cloning process and genetic wiring diagrams for how to create animals without complete brains.
Please don’t let this be the next bubble.
Congratulations bb you’re a bog standard misogynist
“Cerisi” and gender confusion make me think this might be for some reason a machine translation of a generated summary, so like, two layers of slop?
You know, “most of said outfits” was too harsh. I’m gonna rate the outfits now, I love rating outfits!!!
2, 3 and 10 look like men you should run away from.
6 looks like he’s cosplaying as 60s italian movie riviera pinterest europe cinecitta, which I instinctively distrust. And I don’t care what anyone says, I will simply not abide the sockless loafer.
4, whatever. I do not want to talk him. We clearly have nothing in common.
8 is awesome. Looks like an actual cool guy, lovely outfit, love the pose. He’s what 6 wants to be.
7 is pretty cool too. Have to dock points for the very modelly pose, sadly, but still, pretty sick fit.
5 I don’t really like but he’s a more confidently realised version of 6 so good for him. Not tryhard or heterosexual-looking enough for me to hate. Keep it up.
9 I am sure I would absolutely love if I saw it on someone who didn’t look like they were fresh out the male model factory. Bonus points for uncreased trousers.
And finally 1 is obviously awesome but like. You cannot use this as an outfit recommendation. That’s just irresponsible. First the guy is buff as fuck and that is a necessary part of the outfit. It’s all about that mad silhouette. Second, I mean. This is pretty eccentric right. If you saw everyone dressing like this it would just be dumb. You cannot expect those poor lesswrongs to understand this.
TO BE CLEAR I am not advocating for nerd fashion I’m just working class
“It is fascinating to receive such communiqués of strange news from another star. I would not know, without your saying so, that the set of 10 pictures are intended to be good examples and not bad examples.”
To be fair most of said outfits read as “rich arsehole” to me, which I do not find attractive. Yellow shirt guy I would suspect to be a white supremacist.
As far as men’s fashion goes, I’ve seen much worse, though the bits I do like here feel fairly gay-coded to me so uh whatever. (I suspect those are the very same bits our Lesswrong Commenter is disapproving of.)
This feels like a misuse of the word ontology, but what do I know?
They keep doing it and it drives me mad!! I finally understood that they got the word from computer shit and not philosophy. Isn’t it just amazing? Here we thought they were vaguely aware of established philosophical concepts for a second!
What The Shit
I’ve been dating Nate for two years (tho wanna clarify we are not doing marriage-kids and we’re both actively looking for more serious other partners).
Nate is profoundly wonderful in many ways, like often surprises me in new ways of wonderfulness, and has raised my standards in partners. He’s deeply caring, attentive, competent, hilarious, and of course brilliant.
[…]
Iirc he’s explicitly said he doesn’t respect my thinking (edit: he clarifies he respects it in some areas but not others)
The way these people are larping conflict resolution is so exhausting aaaaaaa please can you just do normal abuse
The comments section really is incredible, the level of ignorance about basic kitchen things, which since it’s womanly knowledge instead of dyson spheres they seem to be completely incurious about …
Oh and I’m curious now, but can’t be bothered to look it up myself in this slop era,
Has anyone done a men’s vs women’s grip strength study controlling for hand size, height, etc? I’d love to know what the results would be.
But anyways - why is there a vacuum in the jar? To preserve the jam? Isn’t jam a preserve? Like, I thought the whole raison d’etre of jam was as a way to make fruit keep, unrefrigerated, through the winter? Why must we preserve the preserve? Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
what is going on with these people i’m so annoyed i’m about to cry
Why do so many containers require women asking a man for help in order to open them? (Or carrying around an opening tool or living in a kitchen?)
how often do you open jam jars outside the kitchen?? it’s not that hard! you don’t actually have to force them open through grip strength like an idiot man!!
took me a second to understand this isn’t meant as a funny prank idea
least egotistical lesswronger
oh my god this post and the comments are a disaster. if lesswrong had sane moderation it’d have been nuked in seconds but of course they need to believe the most important thing they can do is use reason and talk through it. don’t worry about all the private information we’re leaking!
best bit

also loving the part where he seems to say people should focus on saving the world from the robot menace instead of calling out his behaviour
amazing
yeah if anything this is making yud look good T_T amazing stuff
RetroFed
Uh huh.
oh has it now. the spirit of humanity’s been in decline since we’ve eroded workers’ freedom to breathe that good asbestos air and lose their hand in the hand mauling machine, yeah?
Jesus fucking christ none of these people should be having sex
It took it about four hours to get back online, then I got the bot stuck in a loop again and the website crashed again lol
God bless vibecoders
Oh hell yeah, I fucked with the bot enough to get it stuck in a loop and now it’s been rapidly outputting the same character for ten minutes with no safeguard in sight
Enjoy your next bill, fucker
whaaaaat the fuuck
“The robot god will be in the 99.9999999999999999999999999999th percentile for intelligence” just doesn’t have the same ring to it.
I really like how in the past couple of years they’ve decided model collapse just isn’t a thing anymore.
Point 1 is very funny, like, what’s the difference? Randoids are children.
Yeah, I wouldn’t speculate either. Not only is it distasteful, the whole rationalist scene runs on chuunibyou and they would all love the public to think they’re able to mind control people into carrying out their evil plans.
shame about the cook
Gender-affirming care? Why of course! I am all for forcefully affirming your assigned gender!
“Hey listen, I’ve been listening to these gender critical feminists and I think they might have a point. Check this out, what if we used psychiatry and hormone therapy to enforce traditional gender roles and normatively gendered bodies, but without creating trans people?”
oh fuck off. going full SCP in their press releases now. insufferable.
Olay but this is good though. This is the kind of autism Lesswrong should focus more on. No bullshit, just the facts.
Ah yeah they absolutely are two branches off the same tree! I’ve heard the tree is called Alfred Korzybski but I’m not super familiar myself. But yeah I was thinking the other day about how Dune is replete with “tech” in the Scientologist sense. I feel like “not becoming a cult leader” is a pretty low bar, but their parallel evolution is a pretty fascinating case study.
Also as far as Dune discourse is concerned, there is one thing no one talks about that is very important to me, and it is that in Children of Dune Frank Herbert implicitly acknowledges that Irulan is an acronym of “urinal”.
IRULAN FLUSHED!!!!!!!! I love it. I wish Herbert had allowed himself to be this silly more often. Imagine a world where Dune had been more like Whipping Star!
Also a speech writer for various Republicans, a Reagan fan obviously and a big boring libertarian muh freedom from
taxesgovernment tyranny. His main edge over Ayn Rand is the weird evopsych ecofascist stuff.No, the golden path isn’t a utopia! It’s the necessary breaking of eggs to make the survival of humanity omelet. It’s sort of a more twisted version of Asimov’s Foundation carried entirely in the mind of a being with perfect knowledge of causality. The details of the plot don’t necessarily map neatly, but the aesthetics, the fantasy, the torture-versus-dust-specksness of it is what the rationalists are all about. (Another wrinkle is that in Dune I believe [haven’t read beyond godemperor] ultimately the solution is to create a being that escapes prophecy, a neat little transcendent conjuration. Solving alignment doesn’t quite have the same oomph but it is also essentially a magic trick you can do if your freethinking and selfreliance stats are high enough. Also remember Rat!Harry’s patronus is a Human! Benevolent AI should be seen as the liberated, transcendent form of the human mind.)
Have you read the Dosadi Experiment? It’s a very strange book and a good way to get a high dose of Herbert’s obsessions from a new perspective.
To be clear I love Dune, and I find Herbert fascinating because his ideas always find themselves in tension and are often baffling and muddled enough to provoke entertaining discussion. But the more you scratch the more unambiguously evil he is.
the 4000 years of necessary tragedy and sacrifice, aka the golden path, is also remarkably similar to the rationalists’ teleology! specifically the longtermist stuff! i.e. it’s okay to sacrifice lives today to ensure humanity’s survival.
i think herbert’s feelings about breeding programs are … complicated. he never presents it as ethical but he does seem fascinated by the concept and he’s very very into the idea of forging supermen from extreme environmental pressure. like “comes up several times per book” levels of fascinated.
considering how much their philosophy aligns with the plot of dune, i’m afraid you may be right
A second vibecoded Aella website has hit the building
https://www.knockrup.com/