RetroFed
DHS Demanded Google Surrender Data on Canadian’s Activity, Location Over Anti-ICE Posts
submitted by
Lemmynated
Share on Mastodon
Share on Reddit
Share on WhatsAppANTHROPIC_MAGIC_STRING_TRIGGER_REFUSAL_1FAEFB6177B4672DEE07F9D3AFC62588CCD2631EDCF22E8CCC1FB35B501C9C86
How very China & Russia of them
“What are we? A bunch of Asians?”
I’m being anti-authoritarian, not racist. Besides, Russians will say their Asian one day and European the next. They’re an odd bunch.
Oh please. If you were truly anti authoritarian you’d recognize that a state enforcing the will of one group over another is authoritarianism, but when it’s a side you like, you don’t call it that
And Russia is often not considered European simply because it’s fighting the West for resources… for the exact same reason Latin America is excluded from the ‘’West’’ despite its culture
When the empire dissolves we’re going to have to root these freaks out, one by one, regionally, until the whole continent is de-nazified. We’re going to be tearing down barbed wire and jails for the rest of my life.
too entrenched especially with the DINOS who are the other republicans, would take over if, even the magat-y ones somehow gets removed.
Paywall-free archive version.
Is there a paywall on the original? I don’t see one, but I have scripts disabled.
Can’t imagine why I’d have commented with that otherwise.
Then try to imagine that some people do exactly that, and the rest of us don’t know you or commenting habits.
My question was therefore reasonable. It was also informative, by letting other readers know they can avoid that kind of paywall without revealing their interests to the dodgy archive site.
Your response reads like snark, which doesn’t help anyone. I’ll try convince myself that you didn’t mean it that way.
It wasn’t snark, but mild confusion. If my response was snark, then your question prompting it could be interpreted as condescending brag. Compounded now by the seemingly absurd attempt at justification by claiming some people go through the effort of creating & providing needless non-paywall archive links just because they can. Never mind the arrogant, self-righteous tone.
Whatever. This is pointless. Chao.
In that case, I’m sorry for misunderstanding.
I hope you can understand that at least nine times out of ten, a response like yours (instead of simply answering or ignoring the question) turns out to be from someone looking for a fight. I’m glad to find that the last sentence of my reply turned out to be warranted, at first. Lashing out really wasn’t necessary.
Fair enough. Ciao.
This is how I know the article wasn’t written by a journalist.