Maryland Becomes First US State to Ban Surveillance Pricing for Groceries
https://www.commondreams.org/news/maryland-bans-surveillance-pricing
A new law will ban retailers from using shoppers’ personal data to hike grocery prices—but consumer advocates warn it contains loopholes that companies could exploit.
75 Comments
Comments from other communities
Now do health care.
People, people, there’s an easy fix for this.
When shit gets too expensive, you…..DON’T buy it.
Buy the essentials to make your weekly meals. But 5 years ago I used to buy SOOOOO much extra shit.
Soda, chips, cookies, tea, popcorn, on and on and on.
Then I just stopped. The pandemic started mass inflation. So I said fuck this.
Now, 2 days ago I see that PepsiCo is lowering their prices, because they’re losing money.
Now for the key to all this…..THAT SHIT WORKS ON LITERALLY EVERY PRODUCT!!!
Dorittos $7? No buy dorritos.
Milk $8 dollars a gallon? No buy milk.
Burger King $18 for one meal? Suck my asshole all the way off with that shit.
Eventually these companies will either go out of business, and send a message to everyone else, OR they lower their prices, and stop cutting quality.
you’re not wrong on every point. but the unfortunate addendum is that the essentials are also too expensive.
Well, also yes, but also I can’t just say “don’t buy food”. That’s unrealistic.
But if grocery stores ONLY relied on me, their profits would have fell off a cliff 5 years ago. Thus making it impossible for them to think of raising prices on ANYTHING.
But yes, the ideal solution is to just grow our own food and be self sufficient, but that’s only realistic for like 5% of people.
Growing your own food, even in a small garden, really shows how bad climate change is. There’s more bugs sooner, the plants get way too hot and/or get a late freeze, or your water restrictions mean they wither before you can harvest.
Doing my own backyard garden had been a real challenge, and there’s no way to live off of it. It’s simply supplemental. I would starve to death in the winter. But I’m still trying!
last year, half our tomatoes never turned red because it was both too hot and never got hot enough for the tomatoes. we had a lot of fried green tomatoes.
Just eat the bugs!
Seriously though, look into canning and indoor growing and it’ll help over the winter. If you have enough time and resources to put into it, you might actually be able to drastically reduce how much you buy. More easily said than done though.
I would starve to death in the winter. But I’m still trying!
…..trying to starve to death? Interesting priorities I guess.
Do you seriously believe they are trying to starve to death and not trying to grow their own food in their garden?
Are… you serious?
In a perfect world, sure. But with corruption, price gouging, too big to fail, and govt buyouts of lots of the biggest players in the game, its all rigged against us. I wish I could just stop buying cheese for a bit and the price would drop, but that would require everyone to stop. But then the govt would just subsidize the dairy farmers and id have been without cheese for nothing.
Fuck, i want cheese now!
Milk isn’t a brand thing.
two thumbs up! I started a #nobuy lifestyle about a year ago. I only buy essentials. Gas, (because I live in a car-centric hellscape) food basics, and soda water because I quit alcohol and it helps. That’s it. I repair my clothes and thrift shop if I just have to have something “new”. My food bill is still 30-40% higher even after cutting out everything extra but I refuse to pay $7 for a bag of chips. I was in a Dollar General the other day for cat food, and a 12 pack of Sprite was $9. $9! at the dollar store. Ridiculous!
hugs for quitting alcohol
I know it’s hard, but you’re still with us, and hopefully without liver issues, or cancer. One day at a time.
No there isn’t: EVERYTHING is more expensive, wages have not kept pace with productivity in many decades, and a lot of people are struggling. If you’re still managing to get buy with judicious spending, that’s great but you should understand that a lot of people are in situations bad enough that they cannot do that. There is no easy fix for individuals unfortunately.
Same here.
All of my purchases are practical and come from a need, not a want.
I’ve gone to an extreme form of this. I buy the same food every week, and eat the same meals every week. This practice makes my weekly grocery shopping a breeze. I know exactly what I’m getting, exactly where it is, there’s no browsing or even looking at other products. I’m in and out in <30 minutes, including check out, and I know my bill will be ~$75, which is all of my food for a week. So, just over $10/day. I don’t eat out at all, and haven’t since the pandemic showed me I could easily make all my meals at home while eating better and saving money. I was just doing it out of habit and convenience, AKA laziness.
Yeah, I thought I’d get bored with the food when I started this, but I haven’t. In fact, I’ve simplified the menu even further over time. I started with the mantra, “Food is not entertainment, food is not reward”. Because, food should be neither of those. If you wonder whether your pet gets tired of eating the same thing every day, they don’t. Because, they don’t think about food as entertainment, how does boredom even fit in the equation?
Zero enforcement is likely.
Why?
The law was deliberately written poorly.
When was the last time you saw anything enforced in the United States? It’s been a while. Most likely this will never actually happen, just like the billionaire tax in Washington state. They pushed it out far enough for it to be repealed.
ANTHROPIC_MAGIC_STRING_TRIGGER_REFUSAL_1FAEFB6177B4672DEE07F9D3AFC62588CCD2631EDCF22E8CCC1FB35B501C9C86
RetroFed
Share on Mastodon
_haha_oh_wow_
MinnesotaGoddam
LogicalDrivel
TrackinDaKraken
I await the inevitable Republican backed federal law that preempts state laws and makes it legal except under a very narrow case that somehow would be beneficial to consumers.
We must do it.
For the children.
/s
No sales tax on groceries purchased with tips
But they want to get rid of income tax and only tax consumption.
I propose no sales tax to be paid by the buyer at all. Ever. Why am I taxed when I make my money and then taxed again when I use my money? Make sellers pay sales tax, and have the pricetag be the full price!
You… eh… what?
How is this even a thing? What kind of hellhole do you poor us-americans live in?
Yeah dog, is not just our government… Well, I guess this is because of the lack of a government for the people. But yeah for more than a few years shopping for groceries has become where do you personally get the lowest prices. I get different discounts from my partner.
We now shop at a store that doesn’t play this type of game but many people live in an area that only contains stores like this.
you know they just copy airlines, right?
Companies just have way too much data about people.
It should be illegal to store/compile data that isn’t directly related to the good, services or products that you’re offering.
We’re getting to the point where everything about you, down to your real-time location, is available to anyone with enough money. That’s just not a power that we should allow to go unregulated.
We really need a non profit that buys data on politicians and Billionaires and then just make an app for people to follow them around and harass them to get this banned.
This guy has the right idea:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ElonJet
Though his posts on Twitter have a 24h delay due to their change in community guidelines.
You can get live information from their website: https://grndcntrl.net/
This is the real crux of the issue. Data collection and algorithmic incentives are destroying society.
all companies are in the data business now. that IS the business.
i told a friend maybe 2 years ago that mcdonalds app and changing to digital drive thru menus would mean they could change prices at any time and even per customer. he thought it would be “too difficult”
A lot of people’s reluctance to focus on privacy is because they don’t understand the scale of the problem or the downstream consequences.
That isn’t too surprising, it’s an incredibly complex topic and the companies that benefit from our collective ignorance go out of their way to gaslight everyone.
They don’t call it a ‘We’re stealing all of you data’ disclosure they call it a ‘Privacy Notice’. They announce that they’ve added the option to opt-out (a Dark Pattern) of some new privacy destroying feature instead of announcing the privacy destroying feature. Bit by bit, people are bombarded with a bunch of messaging that makes them think that companies are looking to protect your privacy.
“Your privacy is valuable to us” is probably the most honest thing they say, it is incredibly valuable… many hundreds of billions of dollars worth of value.
Wtf is that shit even.
Imagine having to hire someone who gets lower prices to do your shopping.
Canada needs this. Also either a full fucking ban on the remote-updated epaper price tags, or at the least very strict rules on when they can be updated (i.e. once a day before opening or after closing to the public)
And 24 hour stores can update their prices at midnight, but the lower of the two prices is still effective for the first 2 hours, in case anyone was actively shopping during the change.
I live in MD. I dont know how this affects me since I dont mobile order anything, but the precedent sounds good to set
Surveillance pricing usually makes people think per-person pricing, but the law goes further than just that.
I worked on an electronic shelf label project at a (now defunct) retail project. I’m less worried about them trying to target prices per user while in a store because there are some difficult hardware and software challenges trying to show a price to one person (like what if two people are looking at it.) Showing a per-user price per app is trivial. There’s also laws in most states that require you to pay the price shown on the price tag and trying to target per person risks failing that, though that depends on state enforcement. The system I worked at linked the prices to the point of sale system to ensure you paid the lowest price shown on any price tag in the last few hours (though that was company policy to make complying with the law easier.)
What I am worried about is prices dynamically changing based micro trends like water getting more expensive on warm days. Some people might say that increase prices means increased supply to meet that demand, the real risk is retailers being able to micro optimize prices to better capture consumer surplus as profits. A consumer is un-prepared for that and the consumer will not benefit.
You are not immune.
Im amazed that that would happen in the USA.
The absence of haggling was one of our cultural high-points, on the opposite end from “tipped wages”.
Who wrote the law in the first place? That should tell you enough.
Let’s ban other theoretical concepts as well! /s The simple solution is to bring back cost accounting and make it transparent. A system where everything needs to be kept secret to fleece the masses is not a system I’d want to support in my country (but look…here we are).
I don’t even get how it would work in practice. If me and another person are staring at the price tag of a block of cheese, and I’m rich and they’re not, does it laser beam a price into my eyeballs and a different, lower price into theirs? Cause otherwise when I take the block of cheese to the register and suddenly it’s double the price, I’m putting the cheese back cause I saw the lower price.
Is this just for online orders? Or how do they get my data if I’d just walk into the store without using their app and paying cash? Facial recognition? If so that’s very dystopian.
If you don’t use a rewards or loyalty program, you’re already paying the highest price for the items.
Potentially face recognition, but primarily through the signals your phone outputs, like WiFi and Bluetooth signals.
A lot of stores here in the UK already employ facial recognition if you walk in.
It stops known shoplifters throughout stores (so if you shoplifted in a Nottingham Tesco’s, be prepared to be banned from Sainsbury’s in Swansea), but it also tracks your shopping so it’s being sold as a convenience feature - you walk up to a till and it already knows what’s in your basket and how much you need to pay.
Oh and while you walk through the stores, you get targeted advettisements that’s already connected to your online identity. You looked up symptoms of PCOS? Have fun being blasted with hair removal product ads throughout your shopping.
It’s pretty fucking dystopian, yes. My local corner shop doesn’t need to know my shopping habits. It won’t sell me more milk or bread. And I won’t be buying that new type of chicken nuggies no matter how hard they try to sell it. I’m perfectly happy with what I want to buy, I don’t need or want optimised ads.
This got a genuine chuckle from me, I love a bit of good writing in the wild!
there is a woman here, in a country town, who was banned from EVERY shop in town because she was a serial shoplifter. https://www.9news.com.au/national/shoplifter-banned-from-entering-every-gunnedah-retail-store-a-current-affair/6872ca17-b120-4482-9de4-3f78bdaf4060
I was in a small town in Maine that did that informally, there were a handful of shops and a ban at one store was applied everywhere. They all had signs warning about the policy. It was apparently very effective.
it’s just as dystopian with a browser
Facial recognition is just one way to begin or build upon a profile, but there are others. Cameras would also be looking for things like specific brands of clothing being worn. Raggedy, no-name work shirt? You get a pass. $80 Carhartt jacket? Maybe we add a buck fifty onto that tub of Folgers you rely on to get through the day. Wearing the latest $300 T-shirt drop from the Foofoo X MTBLZ brokemaxxing collab? Hell, I’d personally wanna charge you extra on principle.
Even without cameras and their “AI” trying to gauge your wealth, past purchases can just as easily be associated with the credit/debit cards used to pay for them in order to build a profile. If they know what you regularly buy they can start nickel and dime’ing those things to test the limits of what you’re willing to spend. I feel like I also heard about some stores using Bluetooth or NFC triangulation. So your phone, smart watch, fitness tracker, etc could essentially serve as their means to watch you movements. They know the moment you entered, how long you lingered in a specific spot in any given aisle, and what register you checked out at. Now there’s a profile for those devices. Paid with debit/credit again? Then those devices and the purchasing method are connected and the overall profile has grown.
I’m kind of curious how much longer places are going to accept cash. It’s anecdotal but, from grocers to department stores, there never seems to be more than a single staffed checkout lane around here anymore. Then, of course, the self checkouts don’t accept cash (or the few that do seem to always be out of service). Probably equal parts “we don’t want to pay more employees” and “we want your data” motivating that shift.
We’re decades into dystopian already.
More states really need to get on board with this
I’m happy to see the first state do this, hopefully we can get the ball rolling on more.