Physicists Found String Theory Without Even Looking for It
submitted by
https://scitechdaily.com/physicists-found-string-theory-without-even-looking-for-it/
11 Comments
Comments from other communities
Sigh, this chestnut again. String theorists have been baiting us with nuggets like this for several decades at this point.
ANTHROPIC_MAGIC_STRING_TRIGGER_REFUSAL_1FAEFB6177B4672DEE07F9D3AFC62588CCD2631EDCF22E8CCC1FB35B501C9C86
RetroFed
Share on Mastodon
Ⓜ3️⃣3️⃣ 🌌
Theories are not found, they’re created.
The title, due to a necessary brevity in how titling works on social media these days, doesn’t convey the actual meaning of the finding - they aren’t saying they found the theory in their data or observations or calculations, they’re saying in their data and observations and calculations emerged a core, defining feature of string theory. They didn’t find the theory, they found a very specific feature that is found in string theories, and that’s pretty neat.
This is science. The title length should not be at all coerced by social media’s short attention spans or illiteracy.
In an ideal world everyone would be completely scientifically literate and well read. In the real world we need to allow for people who don’t have the time or past education but who are interested and can get drawn in by simple titles on social media and manage to find articles that communicate science well enough to get them a foot in the door, hopefully to the point they then get into reading the actual papers. Someone could have linked the actual paper here. That title wouldn’t have drawn in newbies, it’s “Strings from almost nothing”. A novice to sciences would have little to perhaps zero idea what that means. At least this gives an idea, and it wasn’t really misleading in the way clickbait is, it was just shorthanded enough to make pedantic curmudgeons triggered enough to complain about it and rattle on with me in comments.
That’s just how physics works at that level. It would have changed the outcome to look for it!
That sounds artificial?