RetroFed
The era of 1,000 Hz gaming monitors has arrived, but why?
submitted by
Rekall Incorporatedhttps://arstechnica.com/gaming/2026/05/you-probably-dont-need-a-1000-hz-gaming-monitor/
LG’s latest hits one frame per millisecond at a full 1080p resolution.
Share on Mastodon
Share on Reddit
Share on WhatsAppANTHROPIC_MAGIC_STRING_TRIGGER_REFUSAL_1FAEFB6177B4672DEE07F9D3AFC62588CCD2631EDCF22E8CCC1FB35B501C9C86
no clue.. I have 144 and usually don’t even have it enabled.
meanwhile i got my first 165hz monitor and now i get all snooty when games are capped at 60
The human eye can only see 999 FPS /s
Frames per second per sarcasm
Yeah, it’s the rolling of the eyes that really limits it.
“full 1080p” - Big whoop, that’s rookie numbers of pixels
Low Perceived motion blur looks amazing. I only seen 165hz and I can imagine how much better that would look (when or if we uncouple framerate from performance like i heard from Intel gpu guy)
Was he talking about frame generation? Otherwise I don’t really see how that’s supposed to happen.
That is one they used as example but there’s other things people been trying (with different pros and cons). I remember one where it just kept the old frames as needed but that causes a lot of weirdness but it felt really smooth.