The irritating DCA thing is just a manipulation from bankers , stimulating the worst possible gamblers mistake - chasing losses.
DCA claims it averages cost of participation, but that is a pure fallacy:
these are independent events and probability of winning does not increasing with each “entry” even a cheaper one.
What bankers are proposing to you is that you play again to cover previous losses. But the next play has the same probability to losing as the first one .
A couple months old by now, but I still find this a fascinating case study. A good old-fashioned NFT grift, unmoored from time and washed ashore as a sad, solitary UZDoom pull request in the year of the Common Era two thousand twenty six. The honorable representative of “Next Gen Software UK” seems to have taken the rejection in stride and without comment, seemingly only attempting to upstream the NFT features to promote their own fork, ODOOM.
The world of Fintech is such an incredibly dynamic place it is really hard for even a dedicated Fintech influencer to keep up. Fortunately, you have two cows.
I chose this screenshot from the introduction rounds (4 men and 1 woman iirc). The men are tough and evil overlords, and this is the woman. Clearly still aiming at an all male audience.
📊 Chainalysis put out some data claiming that at least half of all TRUMP and MELANIA #memecoin “investors” never bought a token on Solana before and most of them hold less than $200 worth while 50 “whales” have made profits of more than $10 million each, strongly suggesting that the biggest suckers in the #TrumpCoin grift are the #MAGA voter base. Feels like #JustinSun made a deal with Trump to let him fleece the MAGA base and drain money back to #China.
RetroFed
tracyspcy
TheReturnOfPEB
gerikson
David Gerard
db0
sc_griffith
A_norny_mousse
Agent Karyo
Alphane Moon